Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION Status Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical Links Assignors: VENKATESAN, RAMARATHNAM, YUVAL, GIDEON A Publication of US20060294386A1 publication Critical patent/US20060294386A1/en Application granted granted Critical Publication of US7546461B2 publication Critical patent/US7546461B2/en Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC reassignment MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.) Filing date Publication date Application filed by Microsoft Corp filed Critical Microsoft Corp Priority to US11/168,842 priority Critical patent/US7546461B2/en Assigned to MICROSOFT CORPORATION reassignment MICROSOFT CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Original Assignee Microsoft Corp Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.) Yuval Ramarathnam Venkatesan Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.) Expired - Fee Related, expires Application number US11/168,842 Other versions US20060294386A1
OVERBITS ID3 EDITOR PDF
Google Patents Strengthening secure hash functionsĭownload PDF Info Publication number US7546461B2 US7546461B2 US11/168,842 US16884205A US7546461B2 US 7546461 B2 US7546461 B2 US 7546461B2 US 16884205 A US16884205 A US 16884205A US 7546461 B2 US7546461 B2 US 7546461B2 Authority US United States Prior art keywords block sub message blocks random Prior art date Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google Patents US7546461B2 - Strengthening secure hash functions Once you've added all the ways to your route, you can see that the result shows up here, and you can use the "analyze" link on the wiki row to check that you haven't left any gaps.US7546461B2 - Strengthening secure hash functions
If it makes sense to, I'd also create a wiki page like this one (I created that because I wanted somewhere to show a picture of the sgnpost). When you've filled in the wiki captchas at save, check that the page formatting is OK and the links work. Your new relation number goes in the 5th column in the "browse relation" thing.
OVERBITS ID3 EDITOR HOW TO
Then I'd add a row to the appropriate table here, with internal and external links as appropriate (I can never remember how to do these so always end up copying from another row). There's guidance on that (and on other tags) here. Don't add the route name to any way names on the route since the ways themselves aren't called "route name", only the route is.ĭepending on the length and status, you'll probably want to add "network=iwn", "network=nwn", "network=rwn", or "network=lwn" as appropriate. The tags on the new relation should be similar to on this one for a new foot/hiking relation (personally I'd use route=foot on shorter, less arduous ones and route=hiking on others other people may have other ideas).
If it needs to go in, create a new relation by adding part of the route to a new relation (how to do that will vary by editor).
If they haven't, the next question is - should it be in OSM? I'd argue that temporary and unsigned routes shouldn't be included, but permanently waymarked ones should. If it doesn't exist there I'd check other sources where possible to see the route, and check OSM in those areas to see if anyone has added anything (searching is tricky since people may use names that vary slightly). In your case you know it's new as you're creating it :) but I'd first check the relevant section of this page (other countries I'm sure will have similar pages). Normally I'd add these when I find a route signpost that I've not seen before. Here's what I'd do for a new (to me) walking route in the UK.
0 kommentar(er)
